SLAs in Education; did you get what you paid for?

Submitted by hlezama on Thu, 10/19/2006 - 10:58am.

It is almost the end of the first mini at CMU and most of us are grateful that we are going to have a couple of days off.  Turning back for a minute I asked myself… Did I get the educational service I paid for?  Were my courses worthwhile?  Where can I compare if I got what I was supposed to get and if not how do I demand a refund/compensation?  In short, where are the courses’ SLAs?  (read more..)

Think about it for a second, take any given course and ask yourself the above questions.  Many will be tempted to answer: well, I did get what I was supposed to get because we covered the syllabus, but… what about the quality of the service? One can cover the syllabus by letting students read a textbook and that is it; also, there are many courses in which the syllabus is kind of inexistent, they are just meant to be “discussions” about a given topic.

Besides, there are so many components that integrate an educational service: the teacher, the TA’s, the curriculum, the facilities, the learning material, etc.   We didn’t intend to pay for any specific of those items, we paid for the whole package… in my case, I paid for a master (the degree) and the knowledge it supposed to accompany it; but… where is the SLA that will serve me to compare and, in a necessary case, enforce that I’m getting the service levels that I’m supposed to get… in fact what are those levels in the first place?.

 

I’m sure there must be some kind of guidelines that specify, for example, that a teacher should spend at least N number of hours in activities related to his/her class and the same for the TA’s but those are just a small portion of the educational service as a whole.

 

When I discussed the above thoughts with a colleague he told me.. “well, that is what the faculty evaluations are for”. And yes, I agree, they certainly serve to improve the quality of the service but they do not answer my question… where are the SLAs that would allow me to compare if I got what I was supposed to get?  I have taken courses in which I have felt very disappointed (and stated that on the evaluation) and yet I haven’t seen a refund (or some other kind of compensation) in my tuition; how do I argue that I didn’t get the service level I was supposed to get?

 

I guess the answer to the above is that the Educational sector, as well as several other service sectors, is still in the struggle to transform into a more industrialized kind of service in which one could measure a bit more precise the offerings and the actual results that the service is providing; so there are no clear SLAs for the moment.

 

It would be very interesting to hear the audience’s comments on the matter :)


Score: 9.3, Votes: 3

I guess it's very difficult to evaluate the output of the education service right now.

As we know, the education service is an intangible service adding value on the individual personnels. Due to the differences of personnels, the values may also vary from one to another.

And the large part of value of education is the long term benifits. As a full timer in school, we cannot find the value before we get out of here. Also due to this property, usually, education service providers only guarantee the delivery of the service but not the value of the service.

CMU dominated in this deal, since CMU is one of the top school in the US. And the success of many alumni has already proven the possbile value of its service. We paid a lot of tuition here, but we have no where to complain the value.

Submitted by leo82ly on Thu, 10/19/2006 - 3:03pm.